Leadership can be described as the art of navigating complexity, balancing the demands of today with the uncertainties of tomorrow. Succession planning is a critical aspect of this art. At its core, it is about preparing an organisation to thrive beyond the tenure of its current leaders. Yet, it is not merely a functional or managerial exercise. Succession planning is an ethical responsibility that requires positioning, custodianship, and a commitment to the long-term good of the organisation—not merely personal brand or narrow self-interest.
Succession planning gets a lot of press at the board or CEO level with study after study creating something of a burning platform as data is trotted out showing declines in tenure. The Russell Reynolds CEO turnover index clocked the highest number of ‘short-term’ appointments recorded since Q3 2019. Yet with so many eyes on the top prize, succession planning further down the organisational hierarchy is consistently ignored.
This happens for many reasons, not least of which is resistance from senior managers who consciously or unconsciously see it as a threat to their authority and job security. This paradox—where the rational need for succession planning is compromised by emotional factors—poses significant challenges. Addressing these concerns requires a nuanced approach that frames succession planning as preserving and enhancing the leader's legacy, thereby aligning personal and organisational interests.
In this first instalment of a three-part series, I explore the ethical imperatives and strategic priorities of succession planning to establish the foundational principles for developing leadership pipelines that align with organisational values and aspirations.
Succession Planning as an Ethical Responsibility
Succession planning is as much about moral stewardship as it is about organisational continuity. It requires a commitment to ensuring that the transition of power is orderly and preserves the mission, values, and integrity of the organisation. Research supports this philosophical approach, finding that organisations with structured succession plans are more likely to sustain performance and manage leadership transitions effectively. Conversely, the absence of formal plans often leads to instability, eroding employee morale and stakeholder confidence.
At its core, ethical succession planning involves a duty of care that extends beyond operational considerations. Organisations have a responsibility to prepare for leadership transitions in ways that reflect their commitment to fairness, transparency, and accountability. Neglecting this responsibility risks undermining organisational cohesion and can jeopardise the trust of both internal and external stakeholders. By establishing clear, equitable processes for identifying and developing future leaders, organisations demonstrate their adherence to ethical principles while fostering a culture of trust and stability.