Audio
Listen to this essay
Audio
This essay is also available read aloud.
Join to listen →
To read this essay, join the Inner Circle or sign in.
Inner Circle
This one is for the Inner Circle
The Inner Circle is patronage. It funds the research and writing directly, and carries the essays written for it alone, the Canon, and every essay in audio, to play on the page or in your podcast app. References stay on every essay, at every tier: the Inner Circle adds work; it does not withhold evidence.
Most essays are free to members of The Commons, references included.
The Commons
One essay a week, and the argument it belongs to
Free, by email, references included. Sent when it is finished, and not before.
Unsubscribe whenever you like. Nothing is passed to anyone else.
The Inner Circle
Patronage, not subscription
It funds the research and writing directly. What you receive is the work itself: the essays written for it alone, the Canon, and every essay in audio.
Read why it existsMore on Science & Technology
All in Science & Technology →
The Missing Middle in Enterprise AI
Most companies use AI, but few achieve real impact. In part I of this series I explore why people—not tools—determine AI maturity, and why the next serious organisations will dominate the space between pilots and profit.
Free to read
Which Humans? Whose Values? The Cultural Biases of AI
AI models mirror WEIRD cultural norms while claiming universality. Alignment methods reinforce this bias, projecting one community’s “common sense” as global truth. Recognising plurality through Wittgenstein’s language-games and Popper’s falsification reframes alignment as provisional and adaptive,
The Commons
AI Sycophants: How To Stop Your Model From Kissing Up
AI models often mirror our beliefs, rewarding us with agreeable but shallow answers. This sycophancy flatters rather than challenges, eroding judgment and candour. To gain true value, leaders must set incentives that favour truth over comfort, design prompts that demand trade-offs, and treat AI as a
The Commons
No-Click Reading: How AI Summaries Starve Critical Thinking
Clicks are dying, and with them provenance, nuance, and the economics of ideas. AI summaries reward skim over substance. We need friction, attribution, and long-form thinking—treating summaries as aperitifs, not meals—so leaders decide from sources, not headlines.
The Commons
The Limitations of AI in Formal Reasoning
Advances in LLMs show promise, but token bias undermines their logical reliability. Small input shifts can distort outputs, posing risks in fields like medicine, law, and policy. Their dependence on pattern recognition over true reasoning demands closer scrutiny and better design.
The Commons
Leading AI-First Organisations
By employing leaders capable of creating an AI framework — because they are awake and aware to the unintended effects of AI on social well-being, data integrity and privacy, diversity, and governance — organisations seeking to transform into being AI-first are well positioned to engage in trustworth
Inner Circle
Member discussion
The discussion is open to members of the Commons. Join, free, or sign in to take part.