There is no shortage of companies claiming to be purpose-led. What is rarer is a business where purpose actually constrains decisions.
Abdullah Ramay, CEO of Pablo & Rusty's Coffee Roasters, operates in a sector where ideals collide with reality daily. Coffee is agriculture. Agriculture touches ecosystems, supply chains, packaging, flavour, and price. In other words, purpose is not an abstract statement—it lives inside thousands of operational choices.
Many listeners will recognise the name Pablo & Rusty's from the label on their morning brew. Fewer will have considered the governance architecture behind that cup.
In this episode of On the Subject of Leadership, Abdullah and I explore what purpose looks like once the slogans disappear and the trade-offs begin.
The central argument is deceptively simple: profit and purpose are not rivals. Profit is the fuel. Purpose is the direction. Remove either and the enterprise eventually stalls.
Purpose That Fits
One of Abdullah's most useful observations is that organisations rarely choose their purpose in the way consultants suggest. Rather, it emerges at the intersection of capability, conviction, and context.
He often frames this through a simple set of questions:
- What problem do we genuinely care about?
- How does it connect to the product or service we provide?
- Does it resonate with customers and stakeholders?
- Can we meaningfully contribute to change?
- Are we prepared to commit to this for a decade?
This last question is the one that tends to expose fashionable purpose statements. Real commitments require endurance. Leaders will tire of repeating the message long before the market does.
For Pablo & Rusty's, that purpose eventually crystallised around ecosystem protection and restoration. Coffee is grown outdoors. Healthy ecosystems produce better coffee. The alignment is obvious once seen.
But clarity is only the beginning.
The Discipline of Trade-offs
Purpose becomes real the moment it starts to constrain decisions.
Abdullah offers a simple test: would customers accept a sustainable dishwashing liquid that does not clean? Or an ethical coffee that tastes terrible?
The answer, of course, is no.
Purpose cannot compensate for poor core value. It must sit on top of excellence rather than replace it.
This logic explains some of the harder choices Pablo & Rusty's has made. Packaging is a good example. Paper coffee bags appear environmentally appealing but do not currently preserve freshness effectively. The result would be poorer coffee and increased waste.
The company instead uses recyclable post-consumer recycled plastic packaging—an imperfect solution—for eco-warriors—but one that preserves product integrity while reducing environmental impact.
Purpose, in other words, is rarely neat. It often requires disappointing someone.
Authenticity versus Applause
One of the more interesting ideas Abdullah raises is the difference between authenticity and popularity.
Authenticity is coherence over time. It means the inside of the organisation matches what is presented to the outside world.
Popularity, by contrast, is volatile.
Leaders inevitably face moments where those two diverge. When that happens, the real test is whether the organisation maintains its line or bends toward applause.
As Abdullah notes, many purpose-led companies quietly lead with product rather than values. The values are visible through behaviour rather than promotion.
If a company needs to shout about its ethics constantly, customers may reasonably wonder whether the product itself is any good.
The Boardroom Question
Purpose also introduces governance questions.
Boards are accustomed to evaluating investments through financial hurdle rates. But when impact enters the equation, the conversation becomes more complex.
How much financial return is sufficient? What constitutes a credible impact threshold? And how do directors ensure purpose does not become a polite proxy for good intentions?
These questions are becoming increasingly relevant as sustainability, technology, and AI all compete for board attention.
Ultimately, the issue is stewardship.
Boards think in decades. Executives often operate in quarters. Markets move by the hour. Purpose, properly understood, is an attempt to hold those timelines in tension.
Leadership as Stewardship
Our conversation returns repeatedly to one idea: leadership as stewardship.
- Stewardship of brand.
- Stewardship of ecosystem.
- Stewardship of culture and capital.
The real test of purpose is not whether it appears in a brand book or sustainability report. It is whether it continues to shape decisions when those decisions become inconvenient.
Slogans are easy.
Coherence is harder.
And that is precisely where leadership lives.
🎙 Listen to the full conversation with Abdullah Ramay on On the Subject of Leadership.
Available on:
- Apple Podcasts
- Spotify
- YouTube
- or wherever you listen to podcasts.