Mastodon Skip to content

A Six-Move Playbook for Managers Who Need Truth and Traction

A practical guide for managers who need candid teams and consistent delivery. Six disciplined moves that sharpen judgment, normalise challenge, and build the structures that keep work honest, focused, and on track.

A square abstract painting featuring large blocks of red, blue, yellow, and white divided by thick black lines, arranged in a balanced Mondrian-style geometric grid.
Mondrian's disciplined geometry reflects the idea that psychological safety is not emotional looseness but structural clarity—rules, boundaries, and balance.
audio-thumbnail
A Six Move Playbook for Managers Who Need Truth and Traction
0:00
/696.288
💡
If you haven't read part one, start there. It lays out the mechanics—the boundary conditions, the hybrid traps, and why psychological safety without accountability makes teams comfortable but slow. This second instalment picks up where the theory ends and the practice begins.

Managers do not need more slogans about trust or more exhortations to "be vulnerable", they need a method. The practical steps that shape how a team behaves when stakes rise, stakeholders conflict, and the schedule will not slow.

This is where Part 2 lives of this two-part series on psychological safety—in the domain of execution. The moves below are simple, but not easy. They demand management that is precise, transparent, and comfortable with discomfort—good luck with that I hear some sceptics say. But that is the price of candour and the precondition for clarity. It is also something that can provide value even when managers are far from great.

⚠️
It has become vogue for a certain rage bait type to flame this sort of framework on social media. As if by ridiculing something they are drawing attention to a deeper problem—that their managers are not great. I don't disagree that bad managers can turn any tool into theatre. But that's not the point. The value is we don't live in a world populated exclusively by competent managers—nor has any organisation in history achieved that feat. We live in the world as it is: uneven capability, uneven judgment, and a long tail of managers who are neither malicious nor brilliant, just middling.

And in that world, guardrails matter.

For while a simple framework doesn't create great management, it can at least stop the worst habits from compounding. It gives teams something to hold onto when the person in the chair isn't up to the task. To reject structure because a small subset might abuse it is to mistake an edge case for the norm.

Good managers won't need this kind of scaffolding; bad ones won't use it well. But for the large population in the middle—the competent-but-stretched, the developing, the overwhelmed—structure is not Orwellian. It's oxygen.

Below are the six moves I have found to be most useful with management teams. They require no internal taskforce, no three-day retreat with matching ropes course, and no culture consultants. They require only thought and consistency.

1. Call Failures by Their Proper Names

In part one, I distinguished between intelligent failures and basic mistakes. Part two now puts that distinction to work.

A Delicate Dance of Trust and Openness
Psychological safety is often miscast as comfort. It’s time to restore a harder edge: as a discipline that lets teams surface error early, challenge authority safely, and keep standards sharp—especially in hybrid work, where voice is fragile and candour is the real performance engine.

If you haven't already, read part one.

Teams spiral into fear when all failures are treated the same. They spiral into complacency when none are scrutinised. Managers can break those cycles by creating a shared language that classifies failure at the point of review: