Mastodon Skip to content

Conscience, Cynicism, and the Cultivation of Toxicity in Organisations

Toxic leaders flourish not from malice alone but organisational complicity. Their actions breed employee burnout, counterproductive behaviour, and pervasive cynicism, eroding psychological safety and innovation. Addressing toxicity demands ethical leadership development, genuine psychological safety

Old man carrying a lantern in broad daylight as he famously searches for an honest man.
Diogenes Searching for an Honest Man (c. 1780) attributed to J. H. W. Tischbein
Published:
audio-thumbnail
Conscience Cynicism and the Cultivation of Toxicity in Organisations
0:00
/672.072

Toxic leadership is hardly a novelty—human history is littered with egotists, autocrats, and petty tyrants. Today's toxic leaders, however, sport crisp suits rather than robes, preside over meeting rooms rather than courts, and have exchanged decrees for passive-aggressive emails. What remains consistent is the petty backstabbing Still, the notion of toxic leaders exerting a malign influence remains alarmingly pervasive—despite almost every organisation having soaring prose about the importance of ethical behaviour. Indeed, far from a decline in toxic leadership because of values statements being posted in every break room, organisations are proving highly effective incubators rather than inhibitors of toxic leadership. Rewarding those whose behaviours undermine rather than uphold organisational well-being.

At the core of toxic leadership lies a troubling dichotomy of charisma and cruelty—leaders who publicly project virtues such as decisiveness and confidence while privately tormenting their employees. These Jekyll and Hyde managers create climates of unpredictability, significantly raising employee anxiety. The result? Workplaces teeming with insecurity, mistrust, and collective burnout. Indeed, employees often report emotional exhaustion under such leadership styles, describing it vividly as a daily lottery of moods.

The paradox, humorously tragic, is that toxic leaders rarely perceive themselves as problematic. They host seminars on 'team cohesion' without irony, applaud values like accountability in town halls while privately undermining subordinates, and might even win leadership awards, oblivious to their destructive wake. In short, self-awareness among these leaders remains astonishingly scarce, their consciences outsourced to HR departments or the bottom line with the result that 'people tend to see the talk only as window dressing'.

Organisational Consequences of Toxic Leadership

The ripple effects of toxic leadership spread alarmingly fast. Organisations are not simply collections of employees—they are interconnected ecosystems. Thus, the tone set at the top inevitably flows to the entire organisational culture.