Visionary leadership can inspire, but it often falters in dynamic environments where coherence proves more effective. Relying on static visions limits adaptability, while coherent strategies align organisational identity with current realities. Examples like LEGO demonstrate how coherence fosters adaptability, collaboration, and trust. Strategic leadership must balance vision and coherence to ensure responsiveness and long-term resilience.We've all worked with that manager who exhibits an almost primal urge to craft an ideal end-state for the organisation—often dressed up as a corporate 'vision'. It's like imagining a utopian family holiday: everyone knows it won't work out as planned, but it's too tempting not to try. Striking the balance between novelty (think groundbreaking ideas) and believability (ideas the team won't laugh at in private) is notoriously tricky. Empirical evidence shows that most people are not thrilled with the vision presented. Nor are they energised by the overly theatrical process of establishing an organisational vision that tends to resemble a motivational seminar more than a genuine strategy session. Or course, ask the average employee who is worried about losing their job and they will wax lyrical on command—but this enthusiasm is not authentic nor is it truthful. Much less does it motivate employees to do what is in the best interests of the organisation.
This leaves the grand notion of a corporate vision in the category of more decorative than functional, when viewed in a tangled and unpredictable business landscape. After all, when your world feels as stable as a house of cards on a windy day at a company picnic, what really matters is a coherent plan, not visionary flights of fancy. Being coherent means behaving in a way that reinforces who we are as a team or who the business is as an organisation, given the current chaos. Coherence isn't just practical; it's comforting. It's what makes sense to us and to those around us—like the office coffee machine always being slightly broken, yet predictably so. For this reason, vision has an important role to play, but only when it is underpinned by a coherent plan.
The Limits of Visionary Leadership
Love it or hate it, vision is here to stay. If for no other reason than there are some extremely powerful people who have little to contribute but a vision of what tomorrow looks like. It's their contribution and the organisation will go into receivership before their role is made redundant. Stepping away from self-interest and there are also very good reasons for visionary leadership. Specifically, an organisation is a complex ecosystem, or rather a complex set of ecosystems in which a series of teams tend to compete with each other more than with the organisation's actual competition. A key requirement of competent leadership in such an environment is to galvanise these competing groups and self-interests into delivering a singular goal: the good of the company. For this reason, elaborating on a vision is a critical task for organisational leaders. Yet for all its value, visionary leadership often fails. Fewer than 2% of strategic plans incorporating visions succeed. Reliance on static visions in unpredictable environments often limits adaptability and stifles emergent opportunities.
Consider the cautionary tale of Boo.com, a retail startup that epitomised the pitfalls of an inflexible vision. The company's ambitious global launch failed spectacularly as it overestimated market readiness for its high-tech solutions, demonstrating a fundamental misalignment between vision and execution. The strategic emphasis by Boo.com's leadership on an idealised future disregarded present realities, leading to operational incoherence and financial collapse.
Moreover, visionary leaders may become so enamoured with their own ideas that they overlook practical constraints and dissenting perspectives. This tunnel vision can result in strategic myopia, where leaders fail to recognise and respond to immediate challenges, thereby jeopardising organisational stability. While visionary leadership can be effective in providing direction, it must be balanced with other leadership styles to address the complexities of real-world business environments.
- Visionary leadership must be tempered by pragmatism, with strategies rooted in current organisational capabilities.
- Execution should prioritise coherence, ensuring alignment with both internal and external realities.
- Overreliance on a singular vision can lead to strategic myopia, necessitating a balanced leadership approach.
Coherence: The Strategic Anchor
Coherence, defined as the alignment of organisational identity, purpose, and actions, provides a dynamic alternative to traditional vision-based strategies. Coherence emerges through continuous sense-making processes, enabling organisations to navigate complexity effectively. Unlike static visions, coherence fosters adaptability by encouraging iterative adjustments to strategies based on real-time feedback.
The LEGO Group illustrates the transformative potential of coherence. Faced with declining demand for traditional construction toys in the late 1990s, LEGO realigned its identity around imagination. This shift underpinned the successful launch of LEGO Mindstorms, a programmable robotics system that rejuvenated the company's market position. By embracing coherence, LEGO integrated emergent opportunities with its core identity, achieving sustained growth.
Senior managers play a critical role in translating coherence into actionable outcomes. Their responsibilities extend beyond defining strategic goals to cultivating an organisational culture that supports coherence. This involves facilitating open dialogues, setting adaptive boundaries, and empowering teams to make sense of complex environments.
Effective strategic leadership also requires balancing the tensions between control and emergence. Overly rigid structures may stifle creativity, while excessive flexibility risks operational inefficiency. Leaders must adopt a situated approach, tailoring their strategies to specific contexts while maintaining alignment with overarching organisational goals.
Furthermore, strategic leaders must prioritise emotional intelligence in their interactions. Emotionally intelligent leaders are better equipped to navigate the complexities of modern organisations, fostering trust and collaboration among team members. By creating an environment that values psychological safety, leaders can enhance collective sense-making processes, which are essential for coherence.
- Strategic leaders must act as enablers of coherence, fostering environments that balance control and adaptability.
- Leadership strategies should be context-sensitive, aligning organisational actions with current realities.
- Emotional intelligence is a critical competency for fostering trust and collaboration in complex environments.
Practical Recommendations for Aligning Vision and Execution
To operationalise coherence, organisations can adopt the following guiding principles:
- Focus on Identity: Regularly revisit and reaffirm the organisation's core identity to ensure alignment with strategic actions. This process involves engaging stakeholders across all levels to co-create a shared understanding of the organisation's purpose and values.
- Channel Emergence: Facilitate environments where emergent opportunities can be identified and harnessed. This includes promoting interdepartmental collaboration and external stakeholder engagement. According to Edmondson (2019), fostering a culture of psychological safety is crucial for enabling such collaboration.
- Iterative Planning: Replace static strategic plans with dynamic frameworks that allow for ongoing adjustments based on market feedback (Mintzberg & Waters, 1985, p. 173). Dynamic capabilities, as explored by Teece et al. (2018), are instrumental in this regard, enabling organisations to sense and seize opportunities while mitigating risks.
- Leadership Development: Invest in training programs that equip leaders with the skills to navigate complexity and foster coherence. This includes developing competencies in systems thinking, emotional intelligence, and adaptive decision-making.
As Chris Argyris, one of the founders of organisational development succinctly put it, if your organisation's operating environment is stable and readily lends itself to positioning, senior managers must:
- Define a vision.
- Define a competitive strategy consistent with that vision.
- Define organizational work processes that, when executed, will implement the strategy.
- Define individual job requirements so that employees can carry out the processes effectively.
If your operating environment is not stable, coherence eats vision for breakfast and offers a nuanced framework for addressing the challenges of modern business. Unlike static vision-based strategies, coherence accommodates the realities of dynamic markets by aligning organisational identity, purpose, and actions. This alignment enables organisations to respond swiftly to external changes while preserving their core values and mission.
Case studies of successful companies like LEGO repay the reading and demonstrate how coherence can drive innovation and adaptability, creating a sustainable competitive edge. Coherence does not demand the abandonment of vision but instead integrates it into a more flexible and context-sensitive approach. Leaders must focus on fostering environments where coherence emerges organically, supported by iterative planning and stakeholder collaboration.
Ultimately, the future of strategic leadership lies in balancing coherence with visionary elements, ensuring both immediate responsiveness and long-term direction. By embracing coherence, organisations can navigate uncertainty with confidence, securing growth and resilience.
Good night, and good luck.
